I could see people upvoting this post because they think it should be more like −10 than −21. I personally don’t see it as concerning that it’s “only” on −21.
That’s plausible, although I find it somewhat less likely to be a complete or primary explanation based on my recollection of voting patterns/trends on past eugenics-adjacent posts.
In any event, I don’t think “was down-voted a lot” (from harfe’s comment) would be a complete summary of the voting activity.
I could see people upvoting this post because they think it should be more like −10 than −21. I personally don’t see it as concerning that it’s “only” on −21.
That’s plausible, although I find it somewhat less likely to be a complete or primary explanation based on my recollection of voting patterns/trends on past eugenics-adjacent posts.
In any event, I don’t think “was down-voted a lot” (from harfe’s comment) would be a complete summary of the voting activity.