Cautious commenting because my failure to understand you is difficult to phrase in a way that does not sound like a troll
But by—moral value of small animals = 0.05 do you mean you would divert a trolley problem to kill a human if it would save significantly more than 20 otherwise doomed chickens?
Or less gotchay—that you if GW rated chicken saving charities that could reliably save a chicken life for $10 and a human life for $250 you would donate your $250 seeking to do the most good to the chicken saving charity?
I think the 0.05 is a per-day figure, and humans live around 600 times as long as chickens, so it implies indifference between 1 human and 12,000 chickens in the trolley problem. But the OP can correct me here.
The original post was talking about factory farmed chickens, and whether we can reduce their suffering by reducing their population. I don’t think the natural lifespan comes into it—however much we reduce the population of farmed chickens by convincing people not to eat them, we’re not expecting any of the chickens under consideration to live a full and happy life.
It’s hard to frame this as a trolley problem though—we’re not actually comparing human deaths to chicken deaths. The trolley would have to kill 1 human along one path and create 12,000 farmed chickens along the other path.
Cautious commenting because my failure to understand you is difficult to phrase in a way that does not sound like a troll
But by—moral value of small animals = 0.05 do you mean you would divert a trolley problem to kill a human if it would save significantly more than 20 otherwise doomed chickens?
Or less gotchay—that you if GW rated chicken saving charities that could reliably save a chicken life for $10 and a human life for $250 you would donate your $250 seeking to do the most good to the chicken saving charity?
I think the 0.05 is a per-day figure, and humans live around 600 times as long as chickens, so it implies indifference between 1 human and 12,000 chickens in the trolley problem. But the OP can correct me here.
I think you should consider normal life span. Then, humans live around 8 to 16 times as long as chickens. “Chickens may live for five to ten years, depending on the breed.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken#General_biology_and_habitat
The original post was talking about factory farmed chickens, and whether we can reduce their suffering by reducing their population. I don’t think the natural lifespan comes into it—however much we reduce the population of farmed chickens by convincing people not to eat them, we’re not expecting any of the chickens under consideration to live a full and happy life.
It’s hard to frame this as a trolley problem though—we’re not actually comparing human deaths to chicken deaths. The trolley would have to kill 1 human along one path and create 12,000 farmed chickens along the other path.