That’s fair. Personally, I think there is a substantive chance that an underlying theory requires the relative density to be one. This would also resolve the question of why the value is so close to one in the first place if it could’ve been very different (bounded by anthropic arguments I assume).
That’s fair. Personally, I think there is a substantive chance that an underlying theory requires the relative density to be one. This would also resolve the question of why the value is so close to one in the first place if it could’ve been very different (bounded by anthropic arguments I assume).