The beginning of this post and the image made me think this was going to say that impact markets won’t work and are dead. Yet later on you say “ Impact markets continue to be the best system we know of to coordinate philanthropy at scale” and discuss plans to continue/revive the efforts towards impact markets. Perhaps this could be retitled/respun, as a quick reader might get the wrong impression here.
Thanks. I think my writing here is intended to reflect both a felt pessimism (or lack of excitement, anyways) among people I know; and also our own optimism despite that; but also our current (eg 1mo roadmap) is not “full steam ahead on impact markets”.
The beginning of this post and the image made me think this was going to say that impact markets won’t work and are dead. Yet later on you say “ Impact markets continue to be the best system we know of to coordinate philanthropy at scale” and discuss plans to continue/revive the efforts towards impact markets. Perhaps this could be retitled/respun, as a quick reader might get the wrong impression here.
Thanks. I think my writing here is intended to reflect both a felt pessimism (or lack of excitement, anyways) among people I know; and also our own optimism despite that; but also our current (eg 1mo roadmap) is not “full steam ahead on impact markets”.