publicreports of Dustin Moskovitz and Cari Tuna’s net worth give a substantially understated picture of our available resources. That’s because, among other issues, they don’t include resources that are already in foundations.
Are you able to clarify how many resources are already in foundations? (And would that be Open Phil and Good Ventures, or is the bulk of the money that Open Phil “has” technically the money that’s in Good Ventures)?
In addition to the above, what Open Philanthropy’s exposure looks like would be informative to the wider community IMO. Eg: is it just a fairly standard investment portfolio or are they more exposed to Meta than an index would be.
Are you able to clarify how many resources are already in foundations? (And would that be Open Phil and Good Ventures, or is the bulk of the money that Open Phil “has” technically the money that’s in Good Ventures)?
Nathan Young et al forecasted the following here on November 8th:
(I haven’t read all the comments yet, so forgive me if this has already been asked.)
In addition to the above, what Open Philanthropy’s exposure looks like would be informative to the wider community IMO. Eg: is it just a fairly standard investment portfolio or are they more exposed to Meta than an index would be.