There is a lot of thought in this post and a lot of dense context provided in the links.
Overall, “misinformation” seems like an extremely broad area. I find it difficult situating and absorbing the information presented in the links.
The OP has put a lot of content into deep fakes. This seems important, but it’s unclear if this is the subject she is most interested, and it’s unclear how it’s related to “misinformation” overall.
I wish I had more knowledge about what misinformation is and how we should think about it, or its opposite, “Truth”. For example, related to the ongoing invasion of Ukraine, Ukrainian aligned content has dominated western social media. This content isn’t entirely truthful, yet it probably serves the principles of justice and freedom in a way that most people like.
Maybe a way to get more replies and engagement would be for the OP to provide a few paragraphs on what they are most interested in (maybe it is deep fakes, or maybe something else) or provide their views and concerns.
There is a lot of thought in this post and a lot of dense context provided in the links.
Overall, “misinformation” seems like an extremely broad area. I find it difficult situating and absorbing the information presented in the links.
The OP has put a lot of content into deep fakes. This seems important, but it’s unclear if this is the subject she is most interested, and it’s unclear how it’s related to “misinformation” overall.
I wish I had more knowledge about what misinformation is and how we should think about it, or its opposite, “Truth”. For example, related to the ongoing invasion of Ukraine, Ukrainian aligned content has dominated western social media. This content isn’t entirely truthful, yet it probably serves the principles of justice and freedom in a way that most people like.
Maybe a way to get more replies and engagement would be for the OP to provide a few paragraphs on what they are most interested in (maybe it is deep fakes, or maybe something else) or provide their views and concerns.