While we currently expect GiveWell’s marginal opportunity to be slightly (0-30%) below Open Philanthropy’s cost-effectiveness bar for our global health and wellbeing giving in the coming years, I don’t think that should particularly deter you: those figures have huge error bars, much larger than the estimated differences in marginal cost-effectiveness.
I think it is interesting that this is the only reference to cost-effectiveness estimates among so many recommendations. The case for following your recommendations seems quite unclear to me absent such quantification. However, I am glad you still shared them.
Thanks for sharing.
I think it is interesting that this is the only reference to cost-effectiveness estimates among so many recommendations. The case for following your recommendations seems quite unclear to me absent such quantification. However, I am glad you still shared them.