I don’t think so. I’d say they have the potential to be “super-effective in expectation”. To me, “super-effective” with no qualifiers implies high confidence.
Agreed. I was surprised that they’d describe something so speculative as expert-vetted, super effective, etc. If something hasn’t undergone multiple RCTs, then I don’t think it should be promoted as such a highly effective, sure thing.
I don’t think so. I’d say they have the potential to be “super-effective in expectation”. To me, “super-effective” with no qualifiers implies high confidence.
Agreed. I was surprised that they’d describe something so speculative as expert-vetted, super effective, etc. If something hasn’t undergone multiple RCTs, then I don’t think it should be promoted as such a highly effective, sure thing.