I also would be interested in seeing someone compare the tradeoffs on non- views vs person-affecting. E.g. person affecting views might entail X weirdness, but maybe X weirdness is better to accept than the repugnant conclusion, etc.
Agreedāwhile I expect peopleās intuitions on which is ābetterā to differ, a comprehensive accounting of which bullets different views have to bite would be a really handy resource. By ācomprehensiveā I donāt mean literally every possible thought experiment, of course, but something that gives a sense of the significant considerations people have thought of. Ideally these would be organized in such a way that itās easy to keep track of which cases that bite different views are relevantly similar, and there isnāt double-counting.
Agreedāwhile I expect peopleās intuitions on which is ābetterā to differ, a comprehensive accounting of which bullets different views have to bite would be a really handy resource. By ācomprehensiveā I donāt mean literally every possible thought experiment, of course, but something that gives a sense of the significant considerations people have thought of. Ideally these would be organized in such a way that itās easy to keep track of which cases that bite different views are relevantly similar, and there isnāt double-counting.