Some of the LTFF grants (forecasting, long-term institutions, etc.) are broader than GCRs, and my guess is that at least some Fund managers are pretty excited about trajectory changes, so I’d personally think the current name seems more accurate.
Ah OK. The description below does make it sound like it’s only global catastrophic risks.
The Long-Term Future Fund aims to positively influence the long-term trajectory of civilization by making grants that address global catastrophic risks, especially potential risks from advanced artificial intelligence and pandemics.
Perhaps include the word ‘predominantly’ before the word “making”?
The second sentence on that page (i.e. the sentence right after this one) reads:
In addition, we seek to promote, implement, and advocate for longtermist ideas, and to otherwise increase the likelihood that future generations will flourish.
“Predominantly” would seem redundant with “in addition”, so I’d prefer leaving it as-is.
Some of the LTFF grants (forecasting, long-term institutions, etc.) are broader than GCRs, and my guess is that at least some Fund managers are pretty excited about trajectory changes, so I’d personally think the current name seems more accurate.
Ah OK. The description below does make it sound like it’s only global catastrophic risks.
Perhaps include the word ‘predominantly’ before the word “making”?
The second sentence on that page (i.e. the sentence right after this one) reads:
“Predominantly” would seem redundant with “in addition”, so I’d prefer leaving it as-is.
OK sorry this is just me not doing my homework! That all seems reasonable.