To what extent do you think this fits the typical EA brief of ‘important, neglected, tractable’? Even if we think that supporting sturgeon populations is intrinsically valuable—given that the fall in sturgeon populations is caused by overfishing for caviar, isn’t is more obvious to just… not consume it?
To what extent do you think this fits the typical EA brief of ‘important, neglected, tractable’? Even if we think that supporting sturgeon populations is intrinsically valuable—given that the fall in sturgeon populations is caused by overfishing for caviar, isn’t is more obvious to just… not consume it?