Yes, it’s total hubris. And many at OpenAI and DeepMind feel the same way—their company alone can save the world (and prevent the other AI companies from ending it). This is the other AI arms race. It’s as dangerous as the e/acc one. No regard for the fact that the public does not want them to do this.
I’m basically making the same point as the parent comment, although perhaps a bit more starkly, and with the additional point about lack of democratic mandate. Yet that’s on +36 karma and mine is on −6. This is why we need a separate “outside game” movement on AI x-safety.
Yes, it’s total hubris. And many at OpenAI and DeepMind feel the same way—their company alone can save the world (and prevent the other AI companies from ending it). This is the other AI arms race. It’s as dangerous as the e/acc one. No regard for the fact that the public does not want them to do this.
I’m basically making the same point as the parent comment, although perhaps a bit more starkly, and with the additional point about lack of democratic mandate. Yet that’s on +36 karma and mine is on −6. This is why we need a separate “outside game” movement on AI x-safety.