I don’t think it’s at all obvious whether this development is good or bad (though I would lean towards bad), but both here and on LessWrong you have not made a coherent attempt to support your argument. Your concept of “redundancy” in AI labs is confusing and the implied connection to safety is tenuous.
Your concept of “redundancy” in AI labs is confusing and the implied connection to safety is tenuous.
Sorry to nitpick, but I think this specific sentence isn’t true at all; my concept of “redundancy” wasn’t confusing and the implied connection to safety isn’t tenuous.
I don’t think it’s at all obvious whether this development is good or bad (though I would lean towards bad), but both here and on LessWrong you have not made a coherent attempt to support your argument. Your concept of “redundancy” in AI labs is confusing and the implied connection to safety is tenuous.
Sorry to nitpick, but I think this specific sentence isn’t true at all; my concept of “redundancy” wasn’t confusing and the implied connection to safety isn’t tenuous.