I don’t feel your comment substantively responds to any point I made.
1. I said that the motivating question of your post appears to have a straightforward answer. Your response was that it’s futile to reply to this.
2. I said the verbose style was off-putting. Your response was that you think this style is best suited to express your idea in the least amount of words. I find this extremely implausible given sentences like this:
Before the emergence of human consciousness and the cognitive capacity for philosophical abstraction, reality existed as a system of causalities, physical laws, chemical reactions, biological processes, operating independently of interpretation or conceptualization.
Is this really the simplest way to express this idea?
3. I said that two AI detectors labeled your post as AI generated. Your response was that this post was based on a transcript of your video. I watched random sections of your video. The speakers in the video do not speak with the style presented in this post.
I don’t feel your comment substantively responds to any point I made.
1. I said that the motivating question of your post appears to have a straightforward answer. Your response was that it’s futile to reply to this.
2. I said the verbose style was off-putting. Your response was that you think this style is best suited to express your idea in the least amount of words. I find this extremely implausible given sentences like this:
Is this really the simplest way to express this idea?
3. I said that two AI detectors labeled your post as AI generated. Your response was that this post was based on a transcript of your video. I watched random sections of your video. The speakers in the video do not speak with the style presented in this post.