I assume (not from knowledge, so please correct me) that the main reason that hiring managers don’t want to spend their time or the org’s money on independent recruiters—is that the prior about these recruiters being any good is very low.
Do you think this is true?
If so: Wouldn’t it be better for everyone if the recruiters got something-like-an-interview and some of them got a response of “the chance you’ll be good at this are low, probably try something else” and others get “yeah we think you’re promising, enough to put some resources on helping you” ?
[tone: unconfident but no idea what I’m missing, expecting corrections; on board with your vision and trying to brainstorm ways to improve the current situation, or at least improve my understanding of it so that I can think of something better]
I assume (not from knowledge, so please correct me) that the main reason that hiring managers don’t want to spend their time or the org’s money on independent recruiters—is that the prior about these recruiters being any good is very low.
Do you think this is true?
If so: Wouldn’t it be better for everyone if the recruiters got something-like-an-interview and some of them got a response of “the chance you’ll be good at this are low, probably try something else” and others get “yeah we think you’re promising, enough to put some resources on helping you” ?
[tone: unconfident but no idea what I’m missing, expecting corrections; on board with your vision and trying to brainstorm ways to improve the current situation, or at least improve my understanding of it so that I can think of something better]