I think folks should be free to choose what level of AI use they’re comfortable with, without fear of being shamed or outed inherently for using AI. Those who don’t approve are free to downvote or ‘x’ to show their discontent. If enough people feel the same way then the incentives will do their job.
As I said on LinkedIn, you are still engaging with a human… a human that’s using AI.
I see AI as an interesting leveller of the playing field. It gives people less room to dismiss a point of view for being conveyed haphazardly in writing.
Writing well is a skill, built on the existential privilege of intelligence. If you don’t have it, does it mean you have less right to be heard?
I think folks should be free to choose what level of AI use they’re comfortable with, without fear of being shamed or outed inherently for using AI. Those who don’t approve are free to downvote or ‘x’ to show their discontent. If enough people feel the same way then the incentives will do their job.
As I said on LinkedIn, you are still engaging with a human… a human that’s using AI.
I see AI as an interesting leveller of the playing field. It gives people less room to dismiss a point of view for being conveyed haphazardly in writing.
Writing well is a skill, built on the existential privilege of intelligence. If you don’t have it, does it mean you have less right to be heard?