I’ve generally moved to the view that geomeans are better in cases where the different estimates don’t capture a real difference but rather a difference in methodology (while using the arithmetic makes sense when we are capturing a real difference, e.g. if an intervention affects a bunch of people differently).
This makes sense to me.
In any case, this report is definitely superseded/​out-of-date; Stan’s upcoming final report on abrupt sunlight reduction scenarios is far more representative of CEARCH’s current thinking on the issue.
Cool; I am looking forward to it! I assume you will also do an intermediate report on arsenal limitation at some point.
This makes sense to me.
Cool; I am looking forward to it! I assume you will also do an intermediate report on arsenal limitation at some point.