Personally I think it was a mistake to publish this without speaking with Open Phil. They specifically recommended against what you are suggesting here:
In many cases, we find a funding gap we’d like to fill, and then we recommend filling the entire funding gap with a single grant.
Although we didn’t run this post past Open Phil before publishing, we are in touch with Open Phil, and we do ask them for suggestions of places to direct the money we support.
If they were against what is being outlined here, I think they would have said so when we’ve been in touch with them. Instead they were helpful.
Personally I think it was a mistake to publish this without speaking with Open Phil. They specifically recommended against what you are suggesting here:
Although we didn’t run this post past Open Phil before publishing, we are in touch with Open Phil, and we do ask them for suggestions of places to direct the money we support.
If they were against what is being outlined here, I think they would have said so when we’ve been in touch with them. Instead they were helpful.