I agree that the current names arenât ideal. A mix of thoughts:
Agree that the âxâ is misleading. It could be interested to considering throwing out the EAGx branding and see what we come up with (keeping in mind that there are costs of rebranding)
I ran the EA Fellowship Weekend which was targeted at people going through the virtual fellowship programâdonât think itâs ideal, but it was clear that this was for newer people since itâs for people going through the fellowship
a name signalling that this is a local or regional community-driven event (vs. CEA team planning in a particular location) could be good?
words that positively signal being new as a postive, e.g. related to exploring, investigating, discovery, experimentationâyouâre on the start of an exciting adventure or something?
We need an âEAGxxâ to be what an EAGx used to be (an event where people with minimal knowledge of EA can attend, much more top-of-funnel). In some regions, this would be very useful.
These conferences could not use EAGx branding altogether, and possibly not even reference EA in the title if it makes sense, and just make it clear that EA Group X is running it /â itâs funded by CEA (if it is). E.g. Catalyst was a really cool name for a biosecurity summit that was run a few years back.
Also: Communicate to people that the bar for EAGx has increased since before to people having at least a basic understanding of EA
RE: cause areaâWhatâs the value of adding EAGx to the branding of a cause-specific summit? I imagine that people in the community will know itâs organized by EAs, and for people outside the community it could be at best neutral but at worst confusing or off-putting if they arenât interested in EA. But wonder if Iâm missing something?
Iâm really bad with names, so I havenât suggested specific examples.
I agree that the current names arenât ideal. A mix of thoughts:
Agree that the âxâ is misleading. It could be interested to considering throwing out the EAGx branding and see what we come up with (keeping in mind that there are costs of rebranding)
I ran the EA Fellowship Weekend which was targeted at people going through the virtual fellowship programâdonât think itâs ideal, but it was clear that this was for newer people since itâs for people going through the fellowship
a name signalling that this is a local or regional community-driven event (vs. CEA team planning in a particular location) could be good?
words that positively signal being new as a postive, e.g. related to exploring, investigating, discovery, experimentationâyouâre on the start of an exciting adventure or something?
We need an âEAGxxâ to be what an EAGx used to be (an event where people with minimal knowledge of EA can attend, much more top-of-funnel). In some regions, this would be very useful.
These conferences could not use EAGx branding altogether, and possibly not even reference EA in the title if it makes sense, and just make it clear that EA Group X is running it /â itâs funded by CEA (if it is). E.g. Catalyst was a really cool name for a biosecurity summit that was run a few years back.
Also: Communicate to people that the bar for EAGx has increased since before to people having at least a basic understanding of EA
RE: cause areaâWhatâs the value of adding EAGx to the branding of a cause-specific summit? I imagine that people in the community will know itâs organized by EAs, and for people outside the community it could be at best neutral but at worst confusing or off-putting if they arenât interested in EA. But wonder if Iâm missing something?
Iâm really bad with names, so I havenât suggested specific examples.