a) I agree that it would be better if the names were reversed, however, I also agree that it’s locked in now. b) “AIM should be the face of EA and should be feeding in A LOT more to general outreach efforts”—They’re an excellent org, but I disagree. I tried writing up an explanation of why, but I struggled to produce something clear.
a) I agree that it would be better if the names were reversed, however, I also agree that it’s locked in now.
b) “AIM should be the face of EA and should be feeding in A LOT more to general outreach efforts”—They’re an excellent org, but I disagree. I tried writing up an explanation of why, but I struggled to produce something clear.
Yeah on reflection I think b) is too strong (virtue of this being a quick take).
My best explanation is that they don’t have the management capacity to effectively scale and AIM’s current comms are very EA insider coded. Very excited about them making a strong comms hire https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YbP7m187DK6CNbijnu5lHQj4JWpdQB8hR4w6tgFnVfY/edit?usp=drivesdk
I’d be curious about your unpolished thoughts if you’d like to DM me.