The Saturation View confuses me: it seems highly contingent on the idea that most societies have reached diminishing marginal returns per additional person for utility, for which I would assume otherwise. How would attributing intrinsic value to diversity be more valuable than total utilitarianism when a society has not hit diminishing returns?
The Saturation View confuses me: it seems highly contingent on the idea that most societies have reached diminishing marginal returns per additional person for utility, for which I would assume otherwise. How would attributing intrinsic value to diversity be more valuable than total utilitarianism when a society has not hit diminishing returns?