I agree with some points of the post but don’t like at all how it defines the things that cost you the less as “True values” and are recommending people to follow them.
As an agnostic on what is the best way of defining values and how good is for people to do the things they are the most motivated to do, I want to remind people that you could define what your “True values” are as the things you do even tho they cost you more energy; and that doing them could be better.
So I think we agree that it seems good to find the right balance between following costly and not costly values, but calling some of them the True ones seems to imply that you should focus on or do only them.
I agree with some points of the post but don’t like at all how it defines the things that cost you the less as “True values” and are recommending people to follow them.
As an agnostic on what is the best way of defining values and how good is for people to do the things they are the most motivated to do, I want to remind people that you could define what your “True values” are as the things you do even tho they cost you more energy; and that doing them could be better.
So I think we agree that it seems good to find the right balance between following costly and not costly values, but calling some of them the True ones seems to imply that you should focus on or do only them.