My understanding is that there remain a few important points of (friendly) disagreement between you and Will MacAskill e.g. on influentialness of the present, probability of x-risk this century.
Are you interested in discussing these topics with Will further to potentially reach agreement, or to more accurately identify the specific points of contention?
Alternatively are you happy to just agree to disagree?
My understanding is that there remain a few important points of (friendly) disagreement between you and Will MacAskill e.g. on influentialness of the present, probability of x-risk this century.
Are you interested in discussing these topics with Will further to potentially reach agreement, or to more accurately identify the specific points of contention?
Alternatively are you happy to just agree to disagree?