I disagree, I think that making controversial posts under your real name can improve your reputation in the EA community in ways that help your ability to do good. For example, I think I’ve personally benefited a lot from saying things that were controversial under my real name over the years (including before I worked at EA orgs).
Yes, but you’ve usually been arguing in favour of (or at least widening the overton window around) elite EA views vs the views of the EA masses, have been very close to EA leadership, and are super disagreeable—you are unrepresentative on many relevant axes.
I disagree, I think that making controversial posts under your real name can improve your reputation in the EA community in ways that help your ability to do good. For example, I think I’ve personally benefited a lot from saying things that were controversial under my real name over the years (including before I worked at EA orgs).
Yes, but you’ve usually been arguing in favour of (or at least widening the overton window around) elite EA views vs the views of the EA masses, have been very close to EA leadership, and are super disagreeable—you are unrepresentative on many relevant axes.