For example, if funders hire a part-time teacher to develop a curriculum, then they attribute 100% of the development.
Do you mean that if someone is already hired and paid to do a job, that job should not, by default, be considered additionally rewarded through an impact allocation? Or at least if someone is paid at market rate?
Anyone can suggest a non-claimant, who then can choose to be notified.
That seems useful. I would like to err on the side of making sure that more rather than fewer people need to be explicitly asked for their consent for this. Otherwise it’s too easy for someone to miss the call. That’s sort of the opening pages of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. xD
Do you mean that if someone is already hired and paid to do a job, that job should not, by default, be considered additionally rewarded through an impact allocation? Or at least if someone is paid at market rate?
That seems useful. I would like to err on the side of making sure that more rather than fewer people need to be explicitly asked for their consent for this. Otherwise it’s too easy for someone to miss the call. That’s sort of the opening pages of the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. xD