I take your points well. Let me see if I can extrapolate from your enigmatic criticism in more depth:
I should have kept the introduction more to-the-point, especially given the point is probably not a consensus one.
Any “poll of AIs” methodology needs to be consitently accompanied by thorough red-teaming before it can be considered reliable.
Another concern about posts heavy on generative-AI is the dangers of frivolous “cheap talk”. If I’m going to survey AIs, maybe I should relegate all of their generated text into reference-linked pdfs, and keep the main post text carefully FHBH (for humans by humans)!
I agree with these points, and I will address all them in an upgraded re-try soon.
This comment reads to me like it was written by an AI. If I’m right, it sounds like you did not take my criticism to heart.
The writing style of your post, with all the AI-generated text, makes it hard for me to tell what you actually believe, and what was generated by AI. You should skip all the AI text and write what you actually believe.
Another writing technique you might use, if you have something you want to say but you’re not sure how to say it:
Write a list of bullet points summarizing what you want the post to say.
Ask an AI to turn the bullet points into a full post.
(Most important step) Throw away the AI-generated text and just post your bullet points, they will be more useful to readers.
“For Humans By Humans” is a 💯 appropriate rule-of-thumb for posting I agree.
My comment was FHBH ofc, I wouldn’t be so hypocritical as to post #3 and then violate it in the same moment! 🙏
I see the reputational danger! As soon as someone sees a speaker has mixed generated text into their speech once, the the speaker may be marked as “sus” evermore...
Let me amend that. Personally I would have no problem with an AI having its own forum account. But then it would also have to stand on its own merits of conciseness and relevance etc, and earn its own up votes.
Asking AIs about something and then posting their responses is not a useful sort of post.
Beyond that, this post seems to be addressing several things at once and it’s not clear to me what it’s trying to say.
Thanks for the response!
I take your points well. Let me see if I can extrapolate from your enigmatic criticism in more depth:
I should have kept the introduction more to-the-point, especially given the point is probably not a consensus one.
Any “poll of AIs” methodology needs to be consitently accompanied by thorough red-teaming before it can be considered reliable.
Another concern about posts heavy on generative-AI is the dangers of frivolous “cheap talk”. If I’m going to survey AIs, maybe I should relegate all of their generated text into reference-linked pdfs, and keep the main post text carefully FHBH (for humans by humans)!
I agree with these points, and I will address all them in an upgraded re-try soon.
(Recovering from Rejection https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NDRBZNc2sBy5MC8Fw/recovering-from-rejection)
This comment reads to me like it was written by an AI. If I’m right, it sounds like you did not take my criticism to heart.
The writing style of your post, with all the AI-generated text, makes it hard for me to tell what you actually believe, and what was generated by AI. You should skip all the AI text and write what you actually believe.
Another writing technique you might use, if you have something you want to say but you’re not sure how to say it:
Write a list of bullet points summarizing what you want the post to say.
Ask an AI to turn the bullet points into a full post.
(Most important step) Throw away the AI-generated text and just post your bullet points, they will be more useful to readers.
“For Humans By Humans” is a 💯 appropriate rule-of-thumb for posting I agree.
My comment was FHBH ofc, I wouldn’t be so hypocritical as to post #3 and then violate it in the same moment! 🙏
I see the reputational danger! As soon as someone sees a speaker has mixed generated text into their speech once, the the speaker may be marked as “sus” evermore...
Let me amend that. Personally I would have no problem with an AI having its own forum account. But then it would also have to stand on its own merits of conciseness and relevance etc, and earn its own up votes.
Yeah I agree with that.