Really appreciate the transparency and thought behind this, and noting that benefits like partnerships (e.g., with GWWC) may have a longer tail than what the current ROI window captures.
I’m curious: As you continue to assess the portfolio, are there plans to explore alternate or complementary metrics beyond “adjusted money moved”? Especially for orgs experimenting with newer models (like influencer-driven giving or community-based approaches), it seems like traditional ROI might not fully capture longer-term or indirect effects.
Also, love the point about seeding new efforts. Are there specific areas or donor segments you’re especially hoping new orgs might target?
Really appreciate the transparency and thought behind this, and noting that benefits like partnerships (e.g., with GWWC) may have a longer tail than what the current ROI window captures.
I’m curious: As you continue to assess the portfolio, are there plans to explore alternate or complementary metrics beyond “adjusted money moved”? Especially for orgs experimenting with newer models (like influencer-driven giving or community-based approaches), it seems like traditional ROI might not fully capture longer-term or indirect effects.
Also, love the point about seeding new efforts. Are there specific areas or donor segments you’re especially hoping new orgs might target?