Executive summary: This reflective and practical post argues that research taste—commonly perceived as an innate or mystical trait—is in fact a learnable skill composed of intuition, conceptual understanding, and strategic judgment, and can be cultivated through deliberate practice, feedback, and mentorship, especially by focusing on faster feedback loops early in a researcher’s career.
Key points:
Research taste is not innate but trainable—it refers to the collection of judgments and intuitions guiding ambiguous decisions throughout a research project, and can be developed through experience and structured reflection.
Feedback loops are crucial but slow for strategic taste—tactical skills like experiment design offer faster feedback and should be prioritized early; strategic judgments (e.g., project selection) take much longer to calibrate.
Improvement requires both more data and more efficient learning—this includes leveraging mentors, analyzing failures, keeping a research log, and predicting feedback before receiving it.
Taste has multiple interacting components: fast intuition, structured conceptual frameworks, strategic context awareness, and the conviction to persist despite setbacks—all of which can reinforce each other.
Mentorship and active engagement with peers and papers significantly accelerate learning—especially when researchers explicitly model others’ reasoning and critically engage with flawed or unexpected findings.
Patience is essential—building high-quality research taste is a slow, reflective process that benefits from focusing on growth over time rather than early perfection.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.
Executive summary: This reflective and practical post argues that research taste—commonly perceived as an innate or mystical trait—is in fact a learnable skill composed of intuition, conceptual understanding, and strategic judgment, and can be cultivated through deliberate practice, feedback, and mentorship, especially by focusing on faster feedback loops early in a researcher’s career.
Key points:
Research taste is not innate but trainable—it refers to the collection of judgments and intuitions guiding ambiguous decisions throughout a research project, and can be developed through experience and structured reflection.
Feedback loops are crucial but slow for strategic taste—tactical skills like experiment design offer faster feedback and should be prioritized early; strategic judgments (e.g., project selection) take much longer to calibrate.
Improvement requires both more data and more efficient learning—this includes leveraging mentors, analyzing failures, keeping a research log, and predicting feedback before receiving it.
Taste has multiple interacting components: fast intuition, structured conceptual frameworks, strategic context awareness, and the conviction to persist despite setbacks—all of which can reinforce each other.
Mentorship and active engagement with peers and papers significantly accelerate learning—especially when researchers explicitly model others’ reasoning and critically engage with flawed or unexpected findings.
Patience is essential—building high-quality research taste is a slow, reflective process that benefits from focusing on growth over time rather than early perfection.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.