This makes them around 30 times better at reducing suffering and promoting well-being than the highly effective animal charities focused on chicken welfare which themselves are hundreds or thousands of times more effective than the best charities helping humans.
I have updated my cost-effectiveness analysis of corportate campaigns for chicken welfare. Now I estimate the Shrimp Welfare Project is 412 and 173 times as cost-effective as broiler welfare and cage-free campaigns (instead of “around 30 times better”), and that these are 168 and 462 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities (i.e. more like “hundreds” instead of “hundreds to thousands” of times more cost-effective than the best charities helping humans).
Thanks for the great post, Omnizoid!
I have updated my cost-effectiveness analysis of corportate campaigns for chicken welfare. Now I estimate the Shrimp Welfare Project is 412 and 173 times as cost-effective as broiler welfare and cage-free campaigns (instead of “around 30 times better”), and that these are 168 and 462 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities (i.e. more like “hundreds” instead of “hundreds to thousands” of times more cost-effective than the best charities helping humans).