I agree heavily with this sentiment, with a possible addendum – I imagine it could still be possible to have an issue-based coalition that attempts to lobby parties but is not seen as endorsing any parties specifically. In this sense, you could still attempt to lobby Reform as a single-issue coalition, although this strategy might be more aggressive/ gain less traction than simply tacking onto Your Party which is generally more value-aligned.
I was referring to Your Party, as the author was
I agree heavily with this sentiment, with a possible addendum – I imagine it could still be possible to have an issue-based coalition that attempts to lobby parties but is not seen as endorsing any parties specifically. In this sense, you could still attempt to lobby Reform as a single-issue coalition, although this strategy might be more aggressive/ gain less traction than simply tacking onto Your Party which is generally more value-aligned.
Isn’t this what most (regular / non EA) charities will do (about their specific issue of concern)?