Just one major concern: in war and humanitarian work the INT framework may not be sufficient/ideal as in a war you also have to factor in urgency and cascading consequences if logistics supply is not set up promptly, even before you have certainty …
e.g. if chemical protection masks and suits don’t arrive before a toxic ‘accident’, many may die
… so there is a premium on prompt action as part of Critical Pathway Planning, and fine adjustments/discussions can happen in parallel rather than in the slow deliberative way one might normally want to do.
I’ve submitted a very rough draft of how we could profile charities (and perhaps other organizations) to get a feel how they contribute:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/gacpE79RKke2foG9K/rough-attempt-to-profile-charities-which-support-ukrainian
I appreciate your feedback, I’d be happy to get this ball rolling.
Michael hi and I’ll try to read that.
Just one major concern: in war and humanitarian work the INT framework may not be sufficient/ideal as in a war you also have to factor in urgency and cascading consequences if logistics supply is not set up promptly, even before you have certainty …
e.g. if chemical protection masks and suits don’t arrive before a toxic ‘accident’, many may die
… so there is a premium on prompt action as part of Critical Pathway Planning, and fine adjustments/discussions can happen in parallel rather than in the slow deliberative way one might normally want to do.