Gotcha. I agree (like 60%) with this in the sense that I do want to see the “subsidized” services more heavily promoted. However, if I were the person seeing the list I’d also like to see (for-profit or “not subsidized”) services that already work with EA projects or can in some way accommodate needs of EA projects really well and then I’d use my own judgement to decide what service is better suited for me given my own constraints (budget, time, etc.). Hope that makes sense.
Can you think of any specific examples of such services? I really want this list not to get too long, both for the sake of my own time and because I think it becomes less useful the less focused it is, but could be persuaded that some company is just so amazingly useful that it should be on here against the guidelines (hence me wanting them to be guidelines rather than strict criteria).
Gotcha. I agree (like 60%) with this in the sense that I do want to see the “subsidized” services more heavily promoted. However, if I were the person seeing the list I’d also like to see (for-profit or “not subsidized”) services that already work with EA projects or can in some way accommodate needs of EA projects really well and then I’d use my own judgement to decide what service is better suited for me given my own constraints (budget, time, etc.). Hope that makes sense.
(karma upvoted, agreement downvoted)
Can you think of any specific examples of such services? I really want this list not to get too long, both for the sake of my own time and because I think it becomes less useful the less focused it is, but could be persuaded that some company is just so amazingly useful that it should be on here against the guidelines (hence me wanting them to be guidelines rather than strict criteria).