Are we giving away our steering wheel?

EA tries to identify and trains the people most serious about doing good. Yet the culture is, AFAIK, one of continuous altruistic expenditure. Each cycle transfers away control to others, even if those others are aligned with EA goals.

But if this is really a community of those maximizing their impact, shouldn’t we want to empower them to have lasting and compounding influence, lest the direction be abdicated away?

If you believe reasoned compassion should guide large parts of the future, shouldn’t that be by the same institutions, talent, and coordinated network that is dedicated to that, at accumulating scale?

TL;DR: If we believe rational benevolence should steer the world, then a movement permanently spending itself down is making a mistake.

Disclaimer: It’s possible i’m missing key trade-offs or unseen dynamics inside EA’s current structure. This is just my attempt to name a pattern I see.