I think we can just add that I am confident effect 3 will not become relevant until after I am dead. I didnât explicitly state that assumption, but that was what I had in mind. Then we get the problematic conclusion I was worried about I think?
This also raises another interesting question though, which is how bracketing interacts with personal identity being fuzzy. If bracketing cares about aggregating the effects on one âpersonâ then how do we deal with situations involving branching personal identity? I would have thought you would have to frame it in terms of âperson momentsâ, rather than âpersonsâ, in order to be coherent?
Interesting!
I think we can just add that I am confident effect 3 will not become relevant until after I am dead. I didnât explicitly state that assumption, but that was what I had in mind. Then we get the problematic conclusion I was worried about I think?
This also raises another interesting question though, which is how bracketing interacts with personal identity being fuzzy. If bracketing cares about aggregating the effects on one âpersonâ then how do we deal with situations involving branching personal identity? I would have thought you would have to frame it in terms of âperson momentsâ, rather than âpersonsâ, in order to be coherent?