In addition to what Aaron Gertler said, your comment is difficult to read.
For example your first paragraph ends in “But I do have a suggestion to increase awareness and decrease risks”. I guess is that your suggestion is “One way to overcome the lack of motivation is to provide concrete images”. But this comes a lot later on and isn’t really related to paragraphs between it. I think most people will stop reading at this point.
Given the time you spent on this comment, you should know this.
“Alright. Let me ask you something. If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?”
“Is that what you’re asking me? Is there something wrong with anything?”
I always figured when I got older, God would sorta come inta my life somehow. And he didn’t. I don’t blame him. If I was him I would have the same opinion of me that he does.
“The crime you see now, it’s hard to even take its measure. It’s not that I’m afraid of it. I always knew you had to be willin’ to die to even do this job. But, I don’t want to push my chips forward and go out and meet somethin’ I don’t understand. A man would have to put his soul at hazard. He’d have to say: ‘O.K., I’ll be part of this world.’”
My bad, the first paragraph should have my thesis statement right? That and the remaining paragraphs are the supporting arguments. Good luck. The HTML embedding is not working for links. Their is probably a breakdown somewhere but this site needs a better UI.
My point was abstract threats are not motivating. People are terrified of war. But we have been beaten down and have no political agency. For instance, your comment sucks Optimist. You got the moderator mad. Yeah I hope so. People want this problem solved myself included, but the academics are worried about funding and impact factors.
Threads and the day after were the reason the stockpile was reduced. Diplomats had no impact on it until the public was motivated.
In addition to what Aaron Gertler said, your comment is difficult to read.
For example your first paragraph ends in “But I do have a suggestion to increase awareness and decrease risks”. I guess is that your suggestion is “One way to overcome the lack of motivation is to provide concrete images”. But this comes a lot later on and isn’t really related to paragraphs between it. I think most people will stop reading at this point.
Given the time you spent on this comment, you should know this.
Also, you have really great taste in movies:
“Alright. Let me ask you something. If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?”
“Is that what you’re asking me? Is there something wrong with anything?”
I always figured when I got older, God would sorta come inta my life somehow. And he didn’t. I don’t blame him. If I was him I would have the same opinion of me that he does.
“The crime you see now, it’s hard to even take its measure. It’s not that I’m afraid of it. I always knew you had to be willin’ to die to even do this job. But, I don’t want to push my chips forward and go out and meet somethin’ I don’t understand. A man would have to put his soul at hazard. He’d have to say: ‘O.K., I’ll be part of this world.’”
My bad, the first paragraph should have my thesis statement right? That and the remaining paragraphs are the supporting arguments. Good luck. The HTML embedding is not working for links. Their is probably a breakdown somewhere but this site needs a better UI.
My point was abstract threats are not motivating. People are terrified of war. But we have been beaten down and have no political agency. For instance, your comment sucks Optimist. You got the moderator mad. Yeah I hope so. People want this problem solved myself included, but the academics are worried about funding and impact factors.
Threads and the day after were the reason the stockpile was reduced. Diplomats had no impact on it until the public was motivated.