My post was mostly done independent of AGB’s post and I probably would have done something around this either way—the survey was inspired by the POC meetup at EAG London 2019, and as far as I can tell Angela’s post was also
independent. Not sure about the others.
Hm, the 2016 post also looks independent, and possibly informing the CEA’s official stance. The 2017 piece and the 2019 post of the same author also seem to build on other diversity writing to a relatively low extent. The inclusion of diversity in the CEA’s 2020 planning could have advanced the discussion from 2016 as well as responded to general community discourse. The EA Survey collects general demographic data, so may not seek to examine the community diversity based on people’s talent, experience, opinion, and appearance.
My post was mostly done independent of AGB’s post and I probably would have done something around this either way—the survey was inspired by the POC meetup at EAG London 2019, and as far as I can tell Angela’s post was also independent. Not sure about the others.
Hm, the 2016 post also looks independent, and possibly informing the CEA’s official stance. The 2017 piece and the 2019 post of the same author also seem to build on other diversity writing to a relatively low extent. The inclusion of diversity in the CEA’s 2020 planning could have advanced the discussion from 2016 as well as responded to general community discourse. The EA Survey collects general demographic data, so may not seek to examine the community diversity based on people’s talent, experience, opinion, and appearance.