I recently wrote about how AGI timelines change the relative value of ‘slow’ acting neartermist interventions relative to ‘fast’ acting neartermist interventions.
It seems to me that EAs in other cause areas mostly ignore this, though I haven’t looked into this too hard.
My (very rough) understanding of Open Philanthropy’s worldview diversification approach is that the Global Health and Wellbeing focus area team operates on both (potentially) different values and epistemic approaches to the Longtermism focus area team. The epistemic approach of the former seems more reliant on more “common sense” ways to do good.
I recently wrote about how AGI timelines change the relative value of ‘slow’ acting neartermist interventions relative to ‘fast’ acting neartermist interventions.
It seems to me that EAs in other cause areas mostly ignore this, though I haven’t looked into this too hard.
My (very rough) understanding of Open Philanthropy’s worldview diversification approach is that the Global Health and Wellbeing focus area team operates on both (potentially) different values and epistemic approaches to the Longtermism focus area team. The epistemic approach of the former seems more reliant on more “common sense” ways to do good.