Do you think “trust me” arguments are inherently invalid, or that in this case sufficient evidence hasn’t been presented?
I think sufficient evidence hasn’t been presented, in large part because the argument has been tacit rather than overt.
Do you think “trust me” arguments are inherently invalid, or that in this case sufficient evidence hasn’t been presented?
I think sufficient evidence hasn’t been presented, in large part because the argument has been tacit rather than overt.