But a good question is how do you tackle something that is hard earned truths?
Like utopian visions ending up to corrupt all of its founders and the people who believed in it (communism in Russia, China or Cambodia)? Are we always going to leave open ends and keep inquiring even if we have basically tried to repeat the same errors that even have caused massive hurt, deaths and suffering as a civilization?
I see a trend now in fraud that we just as a society is very vulnerable to it—is it really to complex for us? or is it a but that we have in our cognitive ability and only few can understand significant effects of small deceptive actions that aggregates like snowballs growing to avalanches of suffering?
I would appreciate your comment on this Habryka. Thank you.
But a good question is how do you tackle something that is hard earned truths?
Like utopian visions ending up to corrupt all of its founders and the people who believed in it (communism in Russia, China or Cambodia)? Are we always going to leave open ends and keep inquiring even if we have basically tried to repeat the same errors that even have caused massive hurt, deaths and suffering as a civilization?
I see a trend now in fraud that we just as a society is very vulnerable to it—is it really to complex for us? or is it a but that we have in our cognitive ability and only few can understand significant effects of small deceptive actions that aggregates like snowballs growing to avalanches of suffering?
I would appreciate your comment on this Habryka. Thank you.