Thanks you for writing this. I think it is really good that GWWC is looking to do more to engage people with justice /​ equality based ethical views with effective giving.
However I do think that this article needs more work in order to successfully do that. Essentially this article feels like it is written by a utilitarian thinker trying to shoehorn GWWC recommended charities into an ethical/​justice based framework. Not to say that that shoe-hornung cannot be done but the article does not engage with any of my intuitions about how ethical or justice based morality works, and as a result feels extremely unconvincing. To be constructive I would recommend talking to a whole bunch of people with this kind of equality mind-set and seeing how those conversations go and then redrafting.
Of course this is just my intuitive reading of it. And well done on an interesting piece of work.
PS. I have assumed the aim of this article is to engage people with justice /​ equality based ethical views with effective giving. Please say if this is wrong.
Thanks you for writing this. I think it is really good that GWWC is looking to do more to engage people with justice /​ equality based ethical views with effective giving.
However I do think that this article needs more work in order to successfully do that. Essentially this article feels like it is written by a utilitarian thinker trying to shoehorn GWWC recommended charities into an ethical/​justice based framework. Not to say that that shoe-hornung cannot be done but the article does not engage with any of my intuitions about how ethical or justice based morality works, and as a result feels extremely unconvincing. To be constructive I would recommend talking to a whole bunch of people with this kind of equality mind-set and seeing how those conversations go and then redrafting.
Of course this is just my intuitive reading of it. And well done on an interesting piece of work.
PS. I have assumed the aim of this article is to engage people with justice /​ equality based ethical views with effective giving. Please say if this is wrong.