(I am writing this comment after having only read the first ~10 paragraphs of the post)
In your post about “deep work” you wrote:
I came in already convinced that deep work is important so I sped through a lot of his arguments for it.
Having not read his book—is there actually good backing for his theory? Anything measurable that can show one kind of work style is better than the other?
I’m asking here because I think this could be relevant to why the book hasn’t revolutionised the workplace.
(I am writing this comment after having only read the first ~10 paragraphs of the post)
In your post about “deep work” you wrote:
Having not read his book—is there actually good backing for his theory? Anything measurable that can show one kind of work style is better than the other?
I’m asking here because I think this could be relevant to why the book hasn’t revolutionised the workplace.