Thinking exclusively on improving the global health/​development space, maybe we should be funding other evaluators (TLYCS, Happier Lives Institute for eg) and research on other approaches (again, the WELLBYs approach from HLI, I remember some old debates on investing more in family planning research which seemed somewhat neglected by GW, that debate on randomista development vs more macro economic development also recommended some different approaches etc).
Thinking exclusively on improving the global health/​development space, maybe we should be funding other evaluators (TLYCS, Happier Lives Institute for eg) and research on other approaches (again, the WELLBYs approach from HLI, I remember some old debates on investing more in family planning research which seemed somewhat neglected by GW, that debate on randomista development vs more macro economic development also recommended some different approaches etc).
I would like to see this sort of diversity of approaches/​opinions/​lenses, yes.