Well that’s certainly a concern. I’m made more confident by the fact that REG directs funding to multiple charities that are good candidates for top charity, and I believe their model has reasonably good learning value. Plus 1.5:1 is sufficiently higher than 1:1 that I believe it’s more likely to have a positive multiplicative effect from outside view.
I’m not sure I understand. I would think that in the face of uncertainty it would be better to divide donations in accordance to how likely we find each model.
Well that’s certainly a concern. I’m made more confident by the fact that REG directs funding to multiple charities that are good candidates for top charity, and I believe their model has reasonably good learning value. Plus 1.5:1 is sufficiently higher than 1:1 that I believe it’s more likely to have a positive multiplicative effect from outside view.
I’m not sure I understand. I would think that in the face of uncertainty it would be better to divide donations in accordance to how likely we find each model.