There have been 50+ studies and large-scale data collection efforts on relative mortality in caged vs. cage-free housing systems and we still don’t have a clear answer on it.
Do you think this is a case of too many studies with small amounts of funding and limited researcher ability/willingness to follow up, and limitations to doing meta-analysis on these? Do you think that larger-scale, more systematic, multi-year larger team collaborative studies and projects could be more effective at generating reliable evidence?
Do you think this is a case of too many studies with small amounts of funding and limited researcher ability/willingness to follow up, and limitations to doing meta-analysis on these? Do you think that larger-scale, more systematic, multi-year larger team collaborative studies and projects could be more effective at generating reliable evidence?