Ah ok that makes sense :)
And you don’t mind taking money from ai safety causes to fund that? Or maybe you think that is a really good thing?
I guess AI safety interventions are less cost-effective than GiveWell’s top charities, whereas I estimate:
Broiler welfare and cage-free campaigns are 168 and 462 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
The Shrimp Welfare Project is 64.3 k as cost-effectivene as GiveWell’s top charities.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Ah ok that makes sense :)
And you don’t mind taking money from ai safety causes to fund that? Or maybe you think that is a really good thing?
I guess AI safety interventions are less cost-effective than GiveWell’s top charities, whereas I estimate:
Broiler welfare and cage-free campaigns are 168 and 462 times as cost-effective as GiveWell’s top charities.
The Shrimp Welfare Project is 64.3 k as cost-effectivene as GiveWell’s top charities.