So, you are basically assuming that institutional change impact is the expected gain (measured by e. g. economic or health improvements, simplified as GD and AMF WELLBY impact estimates, or using other calculations, or measured by other metrics, which can but do not have to be impartial) of a shift to more effective causes, considering discount rate (selected by the user), minus risk (which can be weighted more compared to gain, in some cases, and which includes suboptimal/unintended investment outcomes), and plus leverage and substitutability effects. I would also add complementarity (the impact of influencing other actors’ efficiencies in pursuing their objectives, unless that is considered by leverage).
You would re-run your calculations if it is decision-relevant. I think that re-running the calculation is relevant whenever the persons involved in the strategy or external informants identify a possibility of substantially changed variable (benefit, risk, leverage, or substitutability) (for example, due to a (substantial) change in the government, relevant press release, general discourse change, scientific finding, or partnership changes).
Ok, thank you!
So, you are basically assuming that institutional change impact is the expected gain (measured by e. g. economic or health improvements, simplified as GD and AMF WELLBY impact estimates, or using other calculations, or measured by other metrics, which can but do not have to be impartial) of a shift to more effective causes, considering discount rate (selected by the user), minus risk (which can be weighted more compared to gain, in some cases, and which includes suboptimal/unintended investment outcomes), and plus leverage and substitutability effects. I would also add complementarity (the impact of influencing other actors’ efficiencies in pursuing their objectives, unless that is considered by leverage).
You would re-run your calculations if it is decision-relevant. I think that re-running the calculation is relevant whenever the persons involved in the strategy or external informants identify a possibility of substantially changed variable (benefit, risk, leverage, or substitutability) (for example, due to a (substantial) change in the government, relevant press release, general discourse change, scientific finding, or partnership changes).
Yaaay opportunity spaces.