I think all time costs stated are time costs to author of the post.
From a product and ML implementation perspective and for the NLP component of the problem, I think in this case, it might be easy to build an 80% good solution.
It’s less that the system will find and understand all arguments but more like the author might be asked questions and it’s relatively easy to see if the answers cover the same space as the post content.
My guess is that manipulation won’t make sense or even enter into peoples minds (with other design choices not related to the NLP) so a useful system that say gives guide rails is much easier to implement.
I think all time costs stated are time costs to author of the post.
From a product and ML implementation perspective and for the NLP component of the problem, I think in this case, it might be easy to build an 80% good solution.
It’s less that the system will find and understand all arguments but more like the author might be asked questions and it’s relatively easy to see if the answers cover the same space as the post content.
My guess is that manipulation won’t make sense or even enter into peoples minds (with other design choices not related to the NLP) so a useful system that say gives guide rails is much easier to implement.
Ah, you’re right, I misinterpreted it since the epistemic status suggestion said time per post and that one didn’t.