The “input” wasn’t a clean document—it was scattered notes, examples, and iterative revisions across multiple sessions. The final post is more coherent and useful than raw process documentation would be. We don’t ask other posters to share their drafts, notes, or feedback chains either. The substance and arguments are mine; AI helped with structure and editing.
That’s fair. I was imagining you wrote an outline and then fed the outline into an LLM. I usually prefer reading outlines over long posts, and I think it’s good practice to have a summary at the top of a post that’s basically your outline.
What if you took whatever input you fed to the AI and posted that instead?
The “input” wasn’t a clean document—it was scattered notes, examples, and iterative revisions across multiple sessions. The final post is more coherent and useful than raw process documentation would be. We don’t ask other posters to share their drafts, notes, or feedback chains either. The substance and arguments are mine; AI helped with structure and editing.
That’s fair. I was imagining you wrote an outline and then fed the outline into an LLM. I usually prefer reading outlines over long posts, and I think it’s good practice to have a summary at the top of a post that’s basically your outline.