It’s good, I think, for some sort of public document like this to exist on the Forum.
That said, I’d prefer if it distinguished more carefully between the parts that aim to describe SFE, and those parts that aim to defend it. For example, section 2 seems mostly descriptive, but then goes on to say (to paraphrase) that the relationship between antifrustrationism and preference-satisfaction theory is that the former is better.
(As described elsewhere, I also really don’t like the whole “practical SFE” thing, and think adding that sort of term to the discourse is unhelpful.)
(Disclaimer: I’m unsympathetic to SFE, which may make my comments here come across as a bit more adversarial than I’d really endorse.)
It’s good, I think, for some sort of public document like this to exist on the Forum.
That said, I’d prefer if it distinguished more carefully between the parts that aim to describe SFE, and those parts that aim to defend it. For example, section 2 seems mostly descriptive, but then goes on to say (to paraphrase) that the relationship between antifrustrationism and preference-satisfaction theory is that the former is better.
(As described elsewhere, I also really don’t like the whole “practical SFE” thing, and think adding that sort of term to the discourse is unhelpful.)
(Disclaimer: I’m unsympathetic to SFE, which may make my comments here come across as a bit more adversarial than I’d really endorse.)