Ask for research on network vs open hiring and there’ll be studies in both directions. I don’t know, I imagine they do both. The context of a greatest company in the world is probably different to a lean EA org.
EA focuses very much on cost effectiveness as a central principle. I think hiring could be better at walking the talk in that regard.
We both have skin in the game here—me as a disenfranchised applicant and you as someone whose org relies on there being talent gaps to fill! Thank you for engaging in good faith.
I would just like to say, that if the movement pivoted towards network based hiring we would heavily benefit from this. So me arguing against is a genuine belief not coming from my own benefit.
I do agree with you that the talent density of the EA AR movement has increased in the last few years and there aren’t enough high impact roles to absorb all the talented people. Which is why we have shifted away from just promoting non profit roles to ETG, giving more broadly and policy work.
I just don’t think the solution is open hiring rounds.
And why we also continue to do the skill bottleneck survey every year despite working consistently with organizations to have more objective data on where they are struggling to find people and I do think talent density is a different problem than skill gaps.
Anyhow thanks for engaging and it’s an interesting post to read and the comments are great.
Ask for research on network vs open hiring and there’ll be studies in both directions. I don’t know, I imagine they do both. The context of a greatest company in the world is probably different to a lean EA org.
EA focuses very much on cost effectiveness as a central principle. I think hiring could be better at walking the talk in that regard.
We both have skin in the game here—me as a disenfranchised applicant and you as someone whose org relies on there being talent gaps to fill! Thank you for engaging in good faith.
I would just like to say, that if the movement pivoted towards network based hiring we would heavily benefit from this. So me arguing against is a genuine belief not coming from my own benefit.
I do agree with you that the talent density of the EA AR movement has increased in the last few years and there aren’t enough high impact roles to absorb all the talented people. Which is why we have shifted away from just promoting non profit roles to ETG, giving more broadly and policy work.
I just don’t think the solution is open hiring rounds.
And why we also continue to do the skill bottleneck survey every year despite working consistently with organizations to have more objective data on where they are struggling to find people and I do think talent density is a different problem than skill gaps.
Anyhow thanks for engaging and it’s an interesting post to read and the comments are great.